Comment #2 on issue 13 by [email protected]: ".repeated" is not strictly
necessary
http://code.google.com/p/json-template/issues/detail?id=13
That's true, but with the suggestion your examples wouldn't change. All
that would
happen is that you can omit {.repeated section @} from your templates and
instead
include {.section @}. Since 'functions' and 'classes' are lists, it would
know how
to do the right thing.
That said, as mentioned I don't think the template is any more readable
this way.
But it would be optional.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON
Template" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
