All you need is template includes, right? As a more_formatter thing, you should be able to do it, correct?
On Sep 22, 8:28 pm, Andy Chu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Steven Roussey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have put zero time into thinking about it, but why must the depth of > > the tree must be known at "compile time"? > > What I'm saying is that it's currently impossible to format structures > like this with a single template: > > { name: "foo" > children: [{name: "child1"}]} > > { name: "foo" > children: [{name: "child1", > children: [{name: "grandchild"}]}]} > > But this is mostly a tangent to what you were asking about. I think > compilation would be cool. But it doesn't require using JSON Template > itself to implement the compilation... it can obviously just be done > in Python/JS/whatever. > > It's just that code generation is a use case I would like to support > more, and it almost always requires a single template formatting trees > of various depths (the parse tree). > > Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON Template" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
