Comment #5 on issue 32 by [email protected]: Formatters (and predicates)
should be passed a stack of namespaces, rather than a single one
http://code.google.com/p/json-template/issues/detail?id=32
Well, that will break everyone's existing formatters. And I like being
able to do:
more_formatters={'html': cgi.escape}
rather than:
more_formatters={'html': lambda s, unused: cgi.escape(s)}
For functions that already exist.
I'm assuming here that nobody has formatters that start with non-lowercase
char.
It's a little unconventional but I think it's very simple and elegant.
Template
authors generally don't need to be aware of it.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON
Template" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
