Actually, I dislike not having a target. Well, in the short tests I
like it very much actually. But in the templates I have converted, the
{.if} statement can be *really* far away from the section. And their
is no way to figure out what data the predicate is testing!On Oct 3, 12:22 pm, Andy Chu <[email protected]> wrote: > Seehttp://code.google.com/p/json-template/source/detail?r=287c4d20d2325d... > > The test should explain it. The implementation is a lot cleaner now, > and there's more error checking, since the blocks are separated into > _Section, _RepeatedSection, and _PredicateSection. I'd like to see > this in the JS version too. Hopefully this is final, unless anyone > sees a problem. > > The problem with what was there is that nesting predicates was ambiguous. > > Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON Template" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
