On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Steven Roussey <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Yes. CRDL and all that stuff. Oh, what fun. >> >> What's CRDL? > > Oops. CLDR. > > http://cldr.unicode.org/ > > >> Over time I think people will pick it up naturally, especially >> with the importance of JavaScript and JSON, e.g. to Chrome. > > And server side JS. I needed a template language that had PHP and JS > versions of it. Moving our current system to json-template in PHP. And > have parts that render in JS as well, depending on the interaction > model. I'd like to break out the business layer (keep it in PHP), but > move our presentation layer to JS on the server. The business layer > can run as a service as it is currently designed, even though it runs > integrated at the moment. The presentation layer will run in JS, on > both client and server which will solve lots of problems in double > implementation, and let me implement a different caching layer > paradigm that will hopefully scale more linearly. PHP json-template is > the intermediate step. At any rate, don't forget the importance of > server side javascript in the future.
Right, well there is already a Narwhal package. A lot of people on the list are involved in Narwhal: http://narwhaljs.org/ The JS version can run on the server. The modular definition of includes is a big win there because JS server platforms will have different ways to access the file system. It always has been pure Javascript (no reference to the DOM) and will stay that way because running the tests through v8/cscript enforces this. Andy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JSON Template" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/json-template?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
