heh! That was kind of confusing...Do they know english when they write this
sort of stuff? grin!


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Chris Smart
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Jsonar] dBV versus dBu?


Often, we run into pieces of equipment that either accept or output 
consumer levels (-10dBV) or so-called pro levels (+4dBu).  If 
you're like me, you've never really understood the difference, 
other than pro level is hotter, i.e. louder. Also, pro usually 
means balanced 1/4" or XLR connectors, whereas "consumer" means RCA.

Well, here's some more information on this, thanks to several 
people who were kind enough to answer my question in great detail.

Try this link for auto-conversions:
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm

Now, for the curious, here's the difference between these two 
measurements. Warning: math ahead!

Generally speaking, decibels are a unit of the relative power 
between two signals, or between one signal and another one that's 
known to be at a standard level of power. In the first half of the 
20th century or so, the standard signal power used to be 1 
milliwatt (mW) in a 600 Ohm transmission line--thus the "m" in dBm.

But audio technology isn't dominated by the telephone company any 
more, and we no longer use transmission lines of any kind for audio 
frequency signals (despite what you may see in the ads for 
high-priced cables--or excuse me, "interconnects"--in audiophile 
magazines). As a result, the normal load impedance for nearly all 
analog audio connections is simply "high" (or "high enough to avoid 
loading down the source significantly," whatever "significantly" 
might mean to you), and most audio level measurements have become 
voltage measurements.

The decibel was such a useful unit that it got carried forward and 
transplanted into the brave, new voltage-dominated world, by 
assuming that whenever you compare the levels of any two signals, 
the load impedance on the two of them will be the same. 
Computationally this allows you the shortcut of leaving
current out of the equation; you simply take the logarithm of the 
voltage ratio without computing the power levels explicitly.

But then you have to multiply by 20 rather than 10 (the "deci" in 
decibels) because decibels are still a unit of relative power. By 
implication we assumed that the currents will always be 
proportional to the voltages when we assumed that the load 
impedances were some constant "high enough" value. It's a step into 
virtual reality in a way, but it's been the standard practice for 
decades now.

The u in dBu usually means "unloaded" or "undetermined" and refers 
to impedance. The V in dBV refers to voltage.

What is dBu? A logarithmic voltage ratio with a reference voltage 
of V0 = 0.7746 volt ? 0 dBu
What is dBV? A logarithmic voltage ratio with a reference voltage 
of V0 = 1.0000 volt ? 0 dBV

The home recording level consumer audio of -10 dBV means 0.3162 
volts, that is -7.78 dBu. The studio recording level pro audio of 
+4 dBu means 1.228 volts.

The short answer to the question is approximately 11.8 dB 
difference, that is, lower the volume of your pro +4dBu source by 
approximately 11.8dB and you're at approximately consumer levels, 
-10dBV.

Thanks to a poster over on www.taperssection.com for the following 
math.

-10 dBV is ca. 316 mV while +4 dBu is ca. 1.228 V. The ratio 
between them is ca. 3.886. The log (to the base 10) of that ratio 
is ca. 0.59; 20 times that
is ca. 11.79; voilĂ .

My brain hurts!!!
Chris, who doesn't even remember logarithms from high school math class!


_______________________________________________
Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org.

Jsonar mailing list
[email protected] http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org


_______________________________________________
Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org.

Jsonar mailing list
[email protected]
http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org

Reply via email to