The next specification will be a 1.0 candidate. That means that we believe
we have enough confidence in the specification in its development so far
(.92 and earlier releases) to propose this one as a final candidate,
pending public comment.
So, yes, you can consider this to be a 1.0 beta as you wrote below since
it will be open for public comment.
Connie
> From: "Kirkdorffer, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'Connie Weiss'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: What kind of dialog do developers really have with SUN?
> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:21:17 -0800
>
> Connie,
>
> Thanks for responding. Can you clarify one thing concerning what you wrote:
> will the next spec be a final 1.0 spec or a beta 1.0 spec? If there is to
> be a public comment period I'm assuming 1.0 beta. Correct?
>
> Dan
>
> > ----------
> > From: Connie Weiss[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: Connie Weiss
> > Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 3:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: What kind of dialog do developers really have with SUN?
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > First of all, I apologize for not being able to keep up with all the mail
> > that is posted on this list. After my posting, I did, and continue to,
> > respond
> > to every message that has been sent to me directly. Most of the comments I
> >
> > received were positive. Some were concerned that we were coming out late.
> >
> > What I can assure you is that we are working with everything we've got to
> > get this specification ready for public commment. That is when you, the
> > developer community, will be able to review and give us your full
> > feedback.
> > While we do monitor this list, we are not able to respond to every post.
> > Again, it is a trade off between this and getting what you really want,
> > the specification and reference implementation, out the door.
> >
> > We do value your input and look forward to receiving your comments as soon
> > as
> > we can get to you a specification that we think will help you in the work
> > you are doing.
> >
> > Hang with us, we think you'll like what's coming...
> >
> > Connie
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:04:05 -0800
> > > From: "Kirkdorffer, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: What kind of dialog do developers really have with SUN?
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Back on Feb 11th, Connie Weiss provided us with an update of where
> > things
> > > were with respect to JSP 1.0.
> > >
> > > Since then a number of us have openly expressed concern with her
> > posting,
> > > particularly with how long the process was taking.
> > >
> > > My question is how exactly did/does SUN interact with people commenting
> > on
> > > the specs? Has anyone here ever received any feedback on their
> > feedback?
> > >
> > > Personally, I think that blatantly ignoring legitimate email is rather
> > rude,
> > > yet that's the impression I'm getting from the lack of response we have
> > > received from Connie, or her co-workers, concerning our requests for
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Is it just me or do others feel this way?
> > >
> > > Dan
> > > --
> > > Daniel Kirkdorffer
> > > Sr. Consultant, Syllogistics LLC
> > > Web: http://www.syllogistics.com/
> > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > ==========================================================================
> > =
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> > body
> > > of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
> >
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
