What about this? :

<SWITCH .....>

        <CASE ....>
                .....
        </CASE>

        <CASE ....>
                .....
        </CASE>
        ......
        <DEFAULT>
                .....
        </DEFAULT>

</SWITCH>

But please let it for JSP 2.0 (We want 1.0 now!)

Walter


> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rod McChesney
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 10:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ELSE tag
>
>
> To retain some vestige of HTML or XML syntax, I believe this would
> have to look like
>
> <IF>
> <ELSE>
> </ELSE>
> </IF>
>
> and so on. Otherwise the tags don't nest meaningfully. This kind of
> thing is easy to hack into a parser but SGML/HTML/XML tools won't
> necessarily understand it. Unless I'm just missing something...
>
> Rod McChesney, Korobra
>
>
> Stuart Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > At 03:38 PM 4/27/99 -0700, you wrote:
> > >vis a vis the discussion regarding the '.' vs. the ':', why even
> > >call these things "includeif"??
> > >
> > >I vote for a more programmatic syntax, like, say, "if/else" ala
> > >most common programming languages such as c, java and c++.
> >
> > I vote "aye" to that. I'd also like to see a convention similar to
> > <ELSEIF>, or <ELSEINCLUDEIF> or something to that effect.
> >
> > For example...
> > <INCLUDEIF PROPERTY="bean:[property]" VALUE="value1">
> >         foo
> > <ELSEINCLUDEIF PROPERTY="bean:[property]" VALUE="value2">
> >         bar
> > <ELSE>
> >
> > >Of course what is the analog for the <excludeif> tag?  Does
> > ><excludeif><else></excludeif> make any sense?  Or does it just
> > >give you a headache like it does me?
> >
> > With the existance of <ELSE>, the need for <EXCLUDEIF> would go away.
> >
> > For example:
> > <INCLUDEIF PROPERTY="bean:[property]" VALUE="value1">
> >         do nothing
> > <ELSE>
> >         foo
> > </INCLUDEIF>
> >
> > And as Terry mentioned, it would make more sense to use <IF> <ELSEIF>
> > <ELSE>. Of course, this would require a closeing tag, perhaps </IF> ?
> >
> > My .02
> > Stuart G. Hargreaves
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (W) 415.659.6314
> >
> >
> ==================================================================
> =========
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> > of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include
> in the body
> of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to