I'd be interested in any performace data people may want to share with
us.
In priciple there should not be any significant overhead (beyond the
first compile - which can be addressed by precompiling the JSP) in
using JSP. In practice, the only overhead I've heard is small and it
is due to the use of the PrintWriter layers. I want to look at that
more carefully later one, after 1.1.
- eduard/o
> From: Justin Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Is JSP viable in a production environment
>
> There are overhead issues with JSP, but there are also overhead issues
> with template systems as well. In the case of WebMacro (webmacro.org)
> the overhead is almost identical to JSP--both use introspection and
> both compile pages to an intermediate form.
>
> The case of FreeMarker and other template systems is different. They have
> their own back end overhead, probably slightly less than WebMacro or JSP.
> On the other hand they introduce programmer overhead in that you must
> explicitly map your business objects to the FreeMarker data model.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
FAQs on JSP can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
