There seems to be 90% agreement.

With the vendor point of view
, you can look at another way.
You can become a vendor too because
the underlying work is done for you.

I am favouring cayenne because having read
his ideas from the website, they are very much in
agreement with principals I have across.
Principals used in software with 300 + tables
in a database.

 --- Christian Bollmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 20:55 schrieb
jini us:
> > If you are new to struts I suggest you download
> >  community edition(free)of struts called
> strutsstudio
> > from www.strutsstudio.com.
>
> Or www.exadel.com. And there's visual Struts
> support just like in Struts Studio in Oracle JDev
> 10g Preview as well, just to note here. Still: these
> are only tools. But no tool shows you how to
> actually use Patterns or write a well-designed app.
> When it comes to actually coding, you're always
> on your own. But you have to do so, anyway.
> It's better to understand the ideas behind what
> you are doing instead of focusing on concrete
> implementations. Just as always. Then use a tool
> for the details.
>
> > It is the best of the lot ( in my opinion)because
> this
> > particular company is focusing on building an IDE
> for
> > struts framework AS IS. Unlike alot of these other
> > vendors  who want to give you everything and you
> will
> > waste your life time working out which framework
> you
> > should use.
>
> Well, I am in personal contact with a lot of the
> high-profile characters (won't mention names
> here) in the Struts and MVC scenes, and all
> of them basically share your viewpoint, that is:
> Struts is a step in the right direction. But it's
> clearly not the end of all things.
>
> > There are three ORM frameworks which I know of
> which
> > are being used alot with struts when using
> databases
> > with struts.
>
> ORM on the other hand is nothing Struts- or
> generally webtier-related. Struts is entirely
> focused on getting input from web-based
> user interfaces in a MVC-like fashion known
> as Model2 in the J2EE blueprints, plus inter-
> facing with the Model | Business Logic tier
> via Actions. The first version was hacked by
> Craig McClanahan over a weekend, and still:
> Struts doesn't make any assumptions about
> subsequent layers, including the integration
> layer things like OR mappers may belong to.
>
> > you can find two of them at http://db.apache.org
> > OJB & Torque.
> > OJB -  is an Object/Relational mapping tool that
> > allows transparent persistence for Java Objects
> > against relational databases.
> http://db.apache.org/ojb
> > Torque -
> > I am personally favouring cayenne from
> > www.objectstyle.org.
>
> Both Torque and Object Relational Bridge are
> proven solutions to the O/R impedance problem.
> There are may others. But one thing I would
> definitely have a closer look at is the iBATIS
> Database Layer (www.ibatis.com). Credits go
> to Ted Husted here who gave me the link here.
> Before that, I favored Castor (www.exolabs.org),
> but what's the effective difference in the end?
>
> > Incidently struts is also developed at apache.org.
> > As these vendors don't have technical skills or
> > expertise to build their own framework,
> > why use a cut & pasted one and pay for the
> pleasure
> > of buggy & outdated framework.
>
> I think I don't understand the above. Struts is
> developed at apache.org, and its inventor
> Craig R. McClanahan is both a committer
> to apache.org and JSF specificiation lead
> for Sun. Considering technical skills, don't
> underestimate the people working for
> almost any software company I know of,
> they're generally the best of breed when
> it comes to all major companies, good
> people throughout. Then: Struts may be
> the most popular framework forJava
> web MVC2 nowadays, but even it's
> inventor says things could be done better.
> Won't comment on the second part here
> any further, as it speaks for itself. So
> we both agree Struts is good?
>
> -- Chris (SCPJ2)
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
> For digest: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body:
> "set JSP-INTEREST DIGEST".
>
> Some relevant archives, FAQs and Forums on JSPs can
> be found at:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jsp
>  http://archives.java.sun.com/jsp-interest.html
>  http://forums.java.sun.com
>  http://www.jspinsider.com

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?  Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
For digest: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "set JSP-INTEREST DIGEST".

Some relevant archives, FAQs and Forums on JSPs can be found at:

 http://java.sun.com/products/jsp
 http://archives.java.sun.com/jsp-interest.html
 http://forums.java.sun.com
 http://www.jspinsider.com

Reply via email to