Hey Janne! Goran says he has done the job (last line) and describe the
specs of it. He asks if he can contribute it.
The answer is probably "you are very welcome to attach it into JIRA".
Is'nt it?
May be the answer is "This is a Plugin: please add it into the Wiki
instead" ?
Christophe
Janne Jalkanen (JIRA) a écrit :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Janne Jalkanen resolved JSPWIKI-240.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
There is no Date plugin in JSPWiki. Declaring this invalid.
Date plugin modification
------------------------
Key: JSPWIKI-240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-240
Project: JSPWiki
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Plugins
Affects Versions: 2.6.2
Environment: Any
Reporter: Goran Karlic
Priority: Trivial
_This issue originated from JSPWIKI-196_
The *Date Plugin* needs to be modified in order to enable it to represent
points in time that are stored in an format independent way.
# Optional property {{format}} specified the format used for output (_no
modification_)
## If not specified reverts to the user's prefered format
# Optional property {{value}} stores the date according to
{{jspwiki.defaultprefs.template.dateformat}} (e.g. yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ)
## If not specified reverts to the current date and time
This allows the Date Plugin to be used in several ways:
* {{[{Date}]}} would output the current time in the user's prefered format
* {{[{Date format='dd.MM.yyyy'}]}} would output the current time in the
specfied format
* {{[{Date format='dd.MM.yyyy' value='2008-01-31'}]}} would output
{{31.01.2008}}
* {{[{Date value='2008-04-10 18:20:30+0200'}]}} would output the specified
point in time in the user's prefered format
That can be used to do things like:
{noformat}
-- a.einstein commented this at [{Date value='1905-04-10 18:20:30+0100'}]
{noformat}
and would allow that date and time values are stored independent of their final
representation format.
*I wrote the Date Plugin as descibed above - what's the right way to get it to
included in the next build?*
