I, for one, dislike the promiscuous downloading of JARs and the fact that it uses Yet Another XML Scripting Language to do things. Or at least it did in 1.x, when I used it (and wrote/contributed the PDF plugin that writes documentation). But I'm being petty.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of course, one of the reasons I dislike Maven intensely is the directory > structure... > > /Janne > > On 28 Jan 2009, at 22:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> how does the directory structure look like for an Eclipse web project - >> I would love to see JSPWiki going to a more "mavenized" directory >> structure ... >> >> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html >> >> Siegfried Goeschl >> >> Murray Altheim wrote: >>> >>> +1. No issue for me. >>> >>> Andrew Jaquith wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> (I'll deal with any restructurings as they come... most of my changes >>>> are limited to JSPs at the moment.) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Dirk Frederickx >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> dirk >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Harry Metske >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +2 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2009/1/28 Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could do the restructuring of the JSPWiki source code (it's mostly >>>>>> >>>>>> really >>>>>>> >>>>>>> about creating a proper /WebContent hierarchy, so stuff like /lib/ >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> become /WebContent/WEB-INF/lib) for Eclipse internal deployment, >>>>>>> but it's >>>>>>> going to be a fairly significant shuffleup. So I would like to know >>>>>> >>>>>> whether >>>>>>> >>>>>>> this is okay for other committers? Would it be a major >>>>>>> inconvenience and >>>>>>> when would be a suitable moment for it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Janne >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >
