Andrew, just for my understanding, what is wrong with Jetty that makes our webunit tests fail ?
(and I agree that CDDL License should be ok, since we have more of them already) Harry 2009/3/26 Andrew Jaquith <[email protected]> > Janne and all -- > > The web unit tests are bothering me again. Specifically, the fact that > we can't run them means we aren't getting good visibility to problems > like the container login issue mentioned on the -user list. So I want > to fix them. Again. > > I've gotten fed up with the bother of fixing the particular part of > our web unit tests that are broken -- the embedded Jetty container > that starts the test webapps. Fortunately I found an alternative > webapp container, Winstone, that does exactly what we need. It's > simple to run (can be done at the command line), and best of all it's > TINY. Total additional size is 320k, plus the commons-logging-api jar > (52k), which for some reason it needs. On the other side, I *think* we > could get rid of the jetty-* jars in test (240k in total), which means > the net addition is about 80k. > > I think this is worth doing. I'd like to back-port this to 2.8 so we > can fix the tests there, too. The best part is that this should > actually work, in the sense that it means we don't have to worry about > maintaining TestContainer, which was only meant to be good enough to > barely function. And at the moment it doesn't. > > The only question is, is the CDDL ok? It looks like it probably is, > since we have a license notice for it in docs already. > > Andrew >
