done created a "FutureVersion" release and tagged the issues with it.
kind regards, Harry 2010/5/3 Andrew Jaquith <[email protected]> > +1 > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Janne Jalkanen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Perhaps we should delegate them to a "Future version"? That way they > would > > stay open, but not show up in most lists. > > > > /Janne > > > > On May 2, 2010, at 12:40 , Harry Metske wrote: > > > >> Florian, > >> > >> I just try to keep the list of open issues to a reasonable size. > >> There are so many issues that are open for years with no activity at > all, > >> they just clutter up the list. > >> Every now and then I walk through the list and propose to close some > >> issues > >> that appear to be abandoned and are not serious bugs. > >> > >> But if we want to keep those open, that's fine too. > >> > >> best regards, > >> Harry > >> > >> > >> 2010/5/2 Florian Holeczek <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi Harry, > >>> > >>> recently you've commented some issues with the question whether we get > a > >>> patch, otherwise we'd close this issue. > >>> > >>> IMO we shouldn't do this, as long as it's a valid issue. > >>> > >>> Why would you want to close them? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Florian > >>> > > > > >
