I propose we make a 2-step change for the package rename, first we
introduce the package compatibility with JSPWIKI-719 , when we release 2.9
this will be available and plugin developers have time to adapt their
plugins to the new org.apache.wiki package.
Next step would be to remove JSPWIKI-719 again to reduce the complexity.
We can discuss the amount of time between the two steps.

I'm heading for Sinsheim in an hour, so @JP, perhaps we can meet and shake
hands.

regards,
Harry



2012/11/5 Florian Holeczek <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> short answer from me:
>
> +1 for generics
> -1 for 2.9.0
> +1 for a JIRA issue on this topic (FixVersion 2.9.1) with a good heading
> and description, in order to let people explicitely know about the change.
>
> BTW: I remember Janne's work on an API - is that still in people's heads?
>
>
> @Ichiro: Where will you publish that stuff? I guess it will be under an
> LGPL license?
>
> I always think it's a pity that there are many JSPWiki plugins out there,
> but they're quite hard to find. WDYT of some kind of extension gallery for
> JSPWiki, partly with links, partly with the possibility of hosting the code
> itself, for example apache-extras, google code or so?
>
> Regards
>  Florian
>
> PS @Juan Pablo: Have fun at ApacheCon! Wish I was there too, but there was
> no possibility this time to go there.
>

Reply via email to