Harry, personally at least, I've never needed to do that, at least not with my setup (JDK 7 and Tomcat 7 on Ubuntu Linux) -- just dump the WAR in webapps and it expands fine. You may wish to try again with a newer Tomcat maybe. I would say that would be a Tomcat bug if it couldn't expand the WAR properly.

It will get better once we can Mavenize (and I hope to put in some time to help in that regard), during development/debugging/testing it will just be c:\mvn tomcat7:deploy for a standalone Tomcat or c:\mvn tomcat7:run-war for an embedded Tomcat deployment, in the latter case you won't even need to have Tomcat installed on your machine, but in either case we can avoid the step of needing to go to file managers and copying/pasting the build/WAR to the webapps folder.

Glen

On 12/09/2012 01:03 PM, Harry Metske wrote:
+1 on the proposed changes for the default settings.
There is however still an issue with JSPWiki that makes it unsuitable for a
plain war deployment, you always have to unzip the war into the tomcat
webapps dir to make it work, but I can't find out why this was the case.

regards,
Harry



On 9 December 2012 15:23, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all, JSPWiki is presently nicely configured for (1) those who already
know what they're doing and have JSPWiki in production already, but can be
problematic for (2) newbie evaluators who just want to place a WAR in the
Tomcat and see what JSPWiki looks like and (3) newbie patch submitters who
have to do debugging but are annoyed at needing to re-enter configuration,
authorization and test page info everytime they want to deploy a new WAR.
  I believe OOTB configuration should be better suited for (2) and (3) as
the users in (1) already know how to configure their
jspwiki.properties/jspwiki.**properties.impl files and nearly invariably
have to do so anyway for their production deployments.

I was thinking we should maybe update our jspwiki.properties.impl file
with the following changes:

-jspwiki.baseURL=
+jspwiki.baseURL=http://**localhost:8080/JSPWiki<http://localhost:8080/JSPWiki>

-#jspwiki.workDir =
+jspwiki.workDir = myJSPWikiDir

-jspwiki.fileSystemProvider.**pageDir = @pagedir@
+jspwiki.fileSystemProvider.**pageDir = myJSPWikiDir/p/web/www-data/**
jspwiki/

-jspwiki.**basicAttachmentProvider.**storageDir = @pagedir@
+jspwiki.**basicAttachmentProvider.**storageDir =
myJSPWikiDir/p/web/www-data/**jspwiki/

For incoming newbies in (2), we have a narrow window when they're
evaluating a Wiki for their corporate intranets and anything we can do to
shrink the soap opera between generating a WAR and viewing it from their
local Tomcat would be a good thing.  Here, all we have to say is generate
the WAR (if they haven't downloaded it anyway from the distribution) and
dump in their local Tomcat and they can view it at
http://localhost:8080/JSPWiki and they're done.  Couldn't be simpler.
  While a URL of http://localhost:8080/JSPWiki may not work for *all*
newbies, it's far and away the most common URL for someone prototyping on
their local machine with Tomcat, sharply reducing the % who will still need
to configure the jspwiki.properties file.

Also, combining all files that JSPWiki creates into one place
"myJSPWikiDir" (or whatever you'd want to call it) that Tomcat nicely
creates in the user's home folder helps them easily see all of JSPWiki's
internal moving parts while remaining fully comfortable that JSPWiki isn't
dumping files in system folders that they're going to have trouble finding
and cleaning out later.  It's uncomfortable/unnerving to newcomers to see
OOTB JSPWiki placing files in the "/p/web/..." of their root system drive
(a folder system the average user might not have permission to anyway),
especially for something they're just evaluating locally.

For developers in (3),  these above settings work great for me during
testing and debugging on my local standalone Tomcat, I just need to drop
the generated WAR in Tomcat each time I do an "ant war" without needing to
bother to reconfigure the jspwiki.properties file each time.  This,
however, took me quite a while to figure out on my own and I'd like to have
this setup OOTB for any quick patch submitter without them needing to go
through similar initial headaches.

Regards,
Glen



Reply via email to