Such leadership must create enemies. Or how much money is thrown at it?
In the history of software development, it's been fairly common for a
horrible product to be declared a success and shipped.
If a Mock generated from an interface was used instead of Stub, there
would be a disconnect. Or how much money is thrown at it?

''''

*** CNHC *** CNHC *** CNHC ***

Trade Date: Friday, November 24, 2006
Company: China Health Management Corp.
Symbol: CNHC
Price: $1.34
Target: $10

CNHC BREAKING NEWS:
China Health Management Corp. Announces the Hospital's Setup Proposal
Received Additional Approval from Kunming City, Yunnan, China

CNHC IS BOUND TO BLOW UP! THIS AMAZING NEWS ALONG WITH HEAVY PR PROMOS
ARE DRIVING IT NUTS! WATCH CNHC GO OFF THE CHAIN ON FRIDAY NOV 24!

''''

The benefit comes when it is time to unload the dishwasher, putting the
clean silverware into the drawer. Anything we can do to allow ourselves
to do our best work fits my definition of 'agile'. I'm speaking of the
article by Frederick P.
They make your tests larger and more complicated and less readable.
Mocks make your tests more fragile and more tightly-coupled.
Word-processing, image processing.
I think for many people new to TDD, mocks are their new hammer, and
every problem is treated like a nail, even when a saw or a screwdriver
would be more appropriate for the situation. Word-processing, image
processing.
Here's what that article really says; you might find its emphasis on
agile concepts surprising. Or the production values? If a Mock generated
from an interface was used instead of Stub, there would be a disconnect.
The fact that an agile process is built around an understanding that it
takes people to make something work and that we're not automatons is a
great enabler for improvements. Teenagers think travel is a lark. Such
leadership must extinguish courage.
I prefer to have failing tests tell me when behavior is changing.
Examples: simulating errors in writing a file; simulating connections
with a remote server; simulating errors from remote server.
Such leadership must extinguish courage.
I prefer to have failing tests tell me when behavior is changing. We
know that people, not tools or methodologies, are what makes projects
succeed.
Such leadership must create enemies.
In the history of software development, it's been fairly common for a
horrible product to be declared a success and shipped.
"I AM THINKING OF SENDING MY CHILD TO A PRIVATE.
It's all about using spontaneity as a way to generate songwriting ideas.
Or taken from the sink where it's been soaking.
Retrospectives are the single most important practice I can think of for
any team, because you can't improve without identifying and focusing on
what you need to improve.
My car has maybe a dozen CPUs running software for anti-lock brakes,
digital dashboard, monitoring and controlling the engine, and so on.
Exploratory testing is inherently agile so we work at getting better at
that. You pre-judge the class design rather than evolve it. Refactoring
applies to any type of coding including test scripts. If you change an
object's API, a mock object's API may not change, making your tests
out-of-date with respect to your non-test code. Or taken from the sink
where it's been soaking. Untrained persons, thrown into deep water,
either drown or dog-paddle.
This depends on whether you are using a Mock-generating framework, or
not, and how your mock object is implemented or how the Mock-generating
framework is implemented.
I'm speaking of the article by Frederick P.
Olympic swimmers, on the other hand, have learned an unnatural way of
swimming that is very efficient. I think the Agile Manifesto works from
a testing point of view as well as from a coding point of view.
There may be a little more effort when writing code, because you are
writing programmer-tests to drive writing that code.
I limit my use of Mocks to those situations where the real object will
not reliably do what I want. I'm speaking of the article by Frederick P.
The third step is refactoring. You pre-judge the class design rather
than evolve it.
I'm speaking of the article by Frederick P.
And I can grab bunches of spoons from the spoon sub-bin, and drop them
into the spoon-compartment of the drawer. Refactoring applies to any
type of coding including test scripts.
Collaborating helps communication, so testers should get together with
programmers and with customers from the start of a project, as well as
pairing with each other.
Or the production values? I limit my use of Mocks to those situations
where the real object will not reliably do what I want.
Unloading the dishwasher is much more faster than it would be if I had
to take individual forks out of random sub-bins. Or how much money is
thrown at it? Such leadership must create enemies. If your work is
entirely digital, you're at the mercy of software all the time. You
pre-judge the class design rather than evolve it. Today I had some car
troubles and somehow I have managed to turn that experience into a blog
post loosely related to songwriting. They make your tests larger and
more complicated and less readable.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jsynthlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel

Reply via email to