Atte Wrote > > > FYI, JSynthLib is effectively a dead project. > > I've been wondering why that is, my guesses include: > > 1) Most opensource people (most of which are running linux) are using > softsynths these days. > > 2) People with hardware synths edit through the often included windows > driver, if under linux through wine. > > I'm still a big baffled, because jsynthlib seem like a unique and useful > project. > > -- > peace, love & harmony > Atte > >
Although the learning curve for JSynthLib development is pretty steep, I suspect Atte is right to some degree. It is fairly easy to duplicate most hardware synths with the various emulations available under Linux. Also one can set up a patch on the hardware synth (via tedius button pushing and menu selections and perhaps even patch cords) and then sample it for routine use in something like FluidSynth. Still it would be nice to be able to program legacy synths with a modern interface! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jsynthlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
