On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:28 AM, frankster <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 09/06/11 19:15, Joe Emenaker wrote: > > Oooh. A rate-limited "sendSysex()" or something could be a good addition. > It might need to be a little more complicated than just sendSysex(), > because I think the UI controls could send quite a lot of messages out > if you changed them quite frequently. > I worry that for some synths, the rate limiting is synth-specific. Is there (or are you thinking of) a framework to plug rate limiting into? Or would we need to implement a layer on top of sendSysex()? As for UI controls, we definitely need a smart system for that. If the user drags a slider from 0 to 100, we don't want to send 100 updates, just the few we actually have time for. -Bill Zwicky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Jsynthlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
