Hi! > On a different subject, you are not the only one to critique the > API to Judy. The API was a result of many discussions and > nobody was ever happy with it. So far I have not received a > suggestion (with complete semantics) on a better way to do it. > (Every challenge I have offered has been ignored). >
I can help to make Judy code more portable, elegant with clean set of interaces. But for that, I need your help to understand the code. Even I read "Alan" 3 hours Judy doc more than once, it remains very hard to understand all the internals and dark magic behind it without authors help. > It has been on my wish-list for years to do a "thread-safe" > version of Judy. That would require different semantics to the > Judy API (you can't have pointers to the "Value" area outside > a potential lock or modification of the array by some other > thread.) Your help on this would be appreciated, especially > for C++. None of the original Judy team used C++. > I wrote a lot of large programs in C (>150K LOC) and I never need to use C++. Please, stick with C as there's a lot of interfaces to Judy using the C API. cheers Younès ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Judy-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
