On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:34 AM, skaller wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 00:08 -0600, zooko wrote: >> On Sep 16, 2007, at 11:53 PM, skaller wrote: >> >>>> But it sure has sped up some slow programs dramatically. >>> >>> My experience is slightly different. The Felix gc is actually >>> slightly >>> slower with Judy than the doubly linked list I used before. >>> Memory consumption is about the same I think .. not sure. >> >> What chip architecture are you using? Other people's reports suggest >> that if your machine has 64-byte cache lines then Judy will perform >> much better than with other cache line sizes. > > I personally have a pair of AMD64s at the moment, but Felix is > a portable compiler generating portable ISO C++, so generated > code runs on all architectures and all OS with a C++ compiler.
Well that makes sense, but I wanted to know on what machine(s) you were basing your observation that the new Felix gc (with Judy) is slightly slower than the old (with the doubly linked list). Regards, Zooko ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Judy-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
