On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:43 -0700, Doug Baskins wrote: > John: > > > If you're right, I can remove the -1 check. (But I tried that, > > and stuff failed which works with the check .. if my code > > was bugged it wouldn't work, even with the check..) > > NO, the -1 return is an "error flag" that says "check the error > structure" > for the type of error.
Hmm .. you're right. I put in a debug print, and there are no errors in my code. -1 is never returned, only NULLs :) I must have been confused from when I did have an error (passed array/pointer to array when other was expected). -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Judy-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
