Tony:
Thank you for your contributions. I took a brief look at your patches. The
bug
to example code (Judy1Op()) seems so obvious, I dont understand why it took so
long to
hear about it. The other fixes to the build need to be done, however the
symlink instead
of copy (if I remember correctly) did not work with some versions of "make".
I would appreciate it if you would send a tar-ball of your fixed version
(without symlinks)
so I can more easily merge with my newest version of Judy. I plan on using a
different
build method with the new Judy, since the current one has been troublesome.
My time is currently been trying to get the new Judy finished. I am not sure
if the fixes are urgent enough to fix right now. (going on about 6 years).
Thanks for your interest,
doug
PS. The new Judy is going to be at least twice as fast as Judy-1.0.5. If
Judy1Op()
is really a usefull capability, then it is possible to code a much faster
version.
Again, I really appreciate your feedback.
doug
Doug Baskins <[email protected]>
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:54 PM, Antony Dovgal <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello all.
>
>I'd like to share with you some patches for Judy that my collegues and me
>authored recently.
>
>Some patches are small and unimportant, like this one, fixing example code:
>https://github.com/tony2001/judy/commit/ebec9ced1ebdc3a07a2c2b59a0feb2de786d821b
>
>Some patches are fairly big and might affect something serious.
> Fixing external build:
>https://github.com/tony2001/judy/commit/4d9e316e1fb0e14e5464e1f2d32e07f9387c7f67
> Fixing parallel docs build:
>https://github.com/tony2001/judy/commit/1c0e09432544b6797f0ecafb9ffe2c16e0717162
> Optimize build by using symlinks instead of copying files:
>https://github.com/tony2001/judy/commit/099243bdd3c0d17001d7fbd2042dc2b34da63aa0
>
>There's also a minor bug in configure.ac:
> line 244: if test x"$build_warnings" = xyes; then
>should be
> line 244: if test x"$enableval" = xyes; then
>instead.
>
>This was fixed in another commit, which unfortunately includes other changes:
>https://github.com/tony2001/judy/commit/571e85c65fef9d8cf0d1ae1881018529483e3ad9
>
>Let me know if you'd prefer the patches in some other form, I'd be glad to
>help.
>
>Other than that, we're pretty happy with Judy and would like to thank all the
>developers for it -
>it's become a very important part of our infrastructure during the past 6
>years.
>
>--
>Wbr,
>Antony Dovgal
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
>developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
>paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
>Android apps secure.
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>_______________________________________________
>Judy-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Judy-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
