On 21/02/2014, at 9:24 AM, Alan Silverstein wrote:
> 
> keys is fine, but if you want length-associated instead of
> length-terminated keys, you pretty much have to sort first by length
> (which is at least very cheap and fast using JudyL), even if you miss
> out on sorted-by-accident as a "free" side-effect.

Not sure exactly what you mean, but you can always take an arbitrary
N bytes of anything, including embedded 0 bytes, and translate
it to a UTF-8 NULL terminated string. Then you can use JudySL just
fine, and the proper sort order is preserved because that's a property
of UTF-8 encoding.


--
john skaller
[email protected]
http://felix-lang.org




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Judy-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel

Reply via email to