That's a case of "it'll still work, it'll just be slower" :) Not ideal, but if you really want to do stuff asynchronously, you can always do explicitly it in the script.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bent...@canonical.com>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 13-12-03 07:06 AM, Nate Finch wrote: > > It seems going from asynchronous to synchronous is highly unlikely > > to break anything. It might slow things down a little, if you > > were counting on being able to get some stuff done while it runs, > > but it shouldn't /break /unless someone was specifically trying to > > race the bootstrap and needed to get something done before it > > finishes.... and that's just bad design anyway. > > The one case I had was a script that starts up a bunch of environments > simultaneously, and then runs tests in each environment. But we're > not doing it that way anymore. > > Aaron > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlKfjpAACgkQ0F+nu1YWqI061gCfV29IhhKOakdOvu9vJVv39bvj > GKAAn0qqsFE9+9LsG+NwspyVXzLwXZLi > =ePqV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
