On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nate Finch <nate.fi...@canonical.com> wrote: > For the record, I'm not a fan of duplicating the package name of anything in > the standard library. Obviously, sometimes collisions will happen if a new > package is added to the standard library, but it seems like a bad idea to do > it on purpose. When you're deep in the middle of a file, and you see > > log.Printf()
That looks like a pretty interesting example of when a matching package name *is* a good idea. If I was able to just switch a logging package and be able to have things working seamlessly, I'd love it. gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
