On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Ian Booth <ian.bo...@canonical.com> wrote: > > When I wrote the original email, I was thinking of something like > "juju-team" as > well, for the generic library projects (pending bikeshedding of > "juju-team"). > github.com/juju/... would still be used for all the Juju specific > projects. >
I'm not sure we get much benefit from making this distinction. It's true that someone just reading the juju source will not necessarily be aware that loggo/errgo are independently viable; but whenever anyone sees them actually used in an external project, it will be clear that they *are* independent. Popularising those libraries in the first place is a separate problem, and I'm not sure the precise github url is going to be a major blocker there; and if it *is* -- if we hear people saying "I'd use loggo if it weren't in the juju namespace" -- it'd be pretty easy to fix that, I think. Cheers William
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
