On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:49 PM, David Cheney <david.che...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I don't want to introduce another thing to break CI, we already pull
> from github which is bad enough, but going via gopkg.in introduces an
> additional point of failure which can further reduce the already
> bullet ridden credibility of our CI.
Again, gopkg.in sits in a reliable deployment, with a provable track record.
> I also don't want to start introducing versioned import paths into
> Juju without serious discussion of how to prevent two different
> versions of a package transitively.
go list -f '{{range .Deps}}{{printf "%s\n" .}}{{end}}' | grep gopkg.in
| sort -u | sed 's/\.v[0-9]\+$/\.vN/' | uniq -c | sed '/ 1 /d'
> I am NOT LGTM on any change that introduces gopkg.in redirected import
> paths until the issue above is resolved.
Okay, that's done.
gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
