On 16 July 2014 22:36, David Cheney <david.che...@canonical.com> wrote:
> If that is the blocker. Can we introduce a major version which does > not change the schema at all. Then we know that everyone running Juju > has a functional backup system. As I understand it, we require people > to upgrade in order, without skipping versions. > Doing a stable release for exactly this reason (sooner than it might otherwise happen) has already been discussed in some conversations.
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
