Could caching be an issue?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ryan Beisner
<ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Ditto, also seeing that.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jason Hobbs <jason.ho...@canonical.com>
> wrote:
...
Thanks,https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju:devel:tools.sjson
>>
>> or
>>
>>
>> https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.sjson
>>
>> (unsure which one gets used).
>>
>> Jason
The index
https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/index2.json
points devel streams to
http://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.json
which does contain 28 1.22-beta4 agents which I can also see at
http://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/devel/
Index2 was updated on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 +0000
and the devel product file on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 +0000
ahh. The json was not signed! The signed json is from the previous
release. We will look into this now. I will reply with an update soon.
--
Curtis Hovey
Canonical Cloud Development and Operations
http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
