Yup, I agree with Rog. This is fixing the problem in the wrong place. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:14 PM, roger peppe <roger.pe...@canonical.com> wrote: > I'm afraid I'm not convinced. Declaring the Error method on the > pointer receiver is idiomatic (just grep for ' Error\(' in the Go source) > and is a useful indicator that the error value is always intended > to be a pointer. > > There's a much simpler fix for this: let the errors package > recover from this itself. We can just make Err.Error call fmt.Sprint > to get the error message (a one line change) > > Then a wrapped nil error will print <nil> just like normal nil > errors. > > > On 20 August 2015 at 03:45, Nate Finch <nate.fi...@canonical.com> wrote: >> tl;dr: Don't. Use a value receiver. 99% of the time you can just delete >> the * on the receiver and it'll still work. If you really must use a >> pointer, please handle the case where you're called with a nil receiver. >> >> I spent most of today trying to understand why my new hook command was >> producing this output: >> >> error: %!v(PANIC=runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer >> dereference) >> >> It took me a while to figure out that this is what fmt.Printf("error: %v\n", >> err) outputs when err's Error() method panics. If you're using %s or %v to >> print a value (or use Println which implicitly uses %v), then fmt will look >> for a String() method or Error() method on the value to call, and use the >> output of that for the value's string output. If that method panics, fmt >> prints the panic in the way you see above (everything after the PANIC=). >> >> Of course, the problem here is that there's no type being written, and since >> it was an error interface, it could almost anything. Using %#v skips >> calling the Error/String methods and prints out the values in a go format, >> which told me this was a juju/errors.Err value, wrapping an API params Error >> value which was a nil pointer. When we call Error() on an errors.Err, we >> call Error() on the cause explicitly, which was panicking. >> >> Here's a minimal reproduction http://play.golang.org/p/ncNVrza-hn (you'll >> have to copy it to a local file and go run it, since the playground won't >> run code external to the stdlib). >> >> So what's sort of interesting is that printing the error before it gets >> Traced works fine, but after the trace it is not fine. The errors.Err's >> Error() function looks like it's explicitly calling the Error() method on >> the wrapped Cause error, which is probably the problem. fmt.Printf must use >> some reflection magic to avoid doing that. >> >> Now, the root cause of this particular bug is actually my own mistake. Line >> 21 should check if orig is nil and then assign nil explicitly to err if it >> is. Then errors.Trace would be able to tell that the error is nil and would >> just return nil itself, instead of thinking it's a valid error and wrapping >> it. >> >> However, you can sidestep this entirely by doing one of two things: either >> just make the Error() (or String()) method use a value receiver.. in which >> case this code would produce this output: >> >> %!v(PANIC=value method main.MyError.Error called using nil *MyError pointer) >> >> (you can try it with the repro code I linked to) >> >> This printout is a lot more helpful and useful and obvious than the other >> "nil pointer" printout. >> >> OR >> >> Just handle a nil receiver: >> >> func (e *MyError) Error() string { >> if e == nil { >> return "<nil MyError>" >> } >> return e.Message >> } >> >> (note that it is dereferencing the pointer to e to access the Message field >> which causes the panic. Calling a method on a nil pointer is totally fine >> and will not panic if the code inside does not try to derefence the pointer >> to get to a field). >> >> Grepping through our code, I see a lot of pointer receivers on Error and >> String methods (45 and 77 respectively). I think we should at least change >> all of these to be value methods (unless that's not possible. That's a >> trivial change, and gives a much more useful printout when the pointer is >> nil. >> >> -Nate >> >> -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >> > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev