On 7 April 2016 at 03:55, Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:07 AM Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5 April 2016 at 23:35, Martin Packman <martin.pack...@canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The challenge here is we want Juju 2.0 and all the new functionality
>> > to be the default on release, but not break our existing users who
>> > have working Juju 1.X environments and no deployment upgrade path yet.
>> > So, versions 1 and 2 have to be co-installable, and when upgrading to
>> > xenial users should get the new version without their existing working
>> > juju being removed.
>> >
>> > There are several ways to accomplish that, but based on feedback from
>> > the release team, we switched from using update-alternatives to having
>> > 'juju' on xenial always be 2.0, and exposing the 1.X client via a
>> > 'juju-1' binary wrapper. Existing scripts can either be changed to use
>> > the new name, or add the version-specific binaries directory
>> > '/var/lib/juju-1.25/bin' to the path.
>>
>> How do our plugins know what version of juju is in play? Can they
>> assume that the 'juju' binary found on the path is the juju that
>> invoked the plugin, or is there some other way to tell using
>> environment variables or such? Or will all the juju plugins just fail
>> if they are invoked from the non-default juju version?
>
>
> You can invoke `juju version` from within the plugin and parse the output.
> That's what I've been doing when I need to distinguish functionality.

That seems fine if you are invoking the plugin from the default
unnumbered 'juju'. But running 'juju2 wait' will mean that juju-wait
will be executing juju 1.x commands and fail. And conversely running
'juju1 wait' will invoke juju 2.x and probably fail.

I think the plugin API needs to be extended to support allowing
multiple juju versions to coexist. An environment variable would do
the trick but require every plugin to be fixed. Altering $PATH so
'juju' runs the correct juju would allow existing plugins to run
unmodified (the bulk of them will work with both juju1 and juju2,
since the cli is similar enough that many plugins will work
unmodified.

-- 
Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com>

-- 
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Reply via email to