On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM Anastasia Macmood < anastasia.macm...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi > > A quick update on what keeps us, Juju team, busy... > > This week the team has been busy with an important task of improving > developer experience in addition to improving the product. > > Of course, we have continued highly desired work on persistent storage > with this week's focus on storage import [1] as well non-destructive > storage removal [2] aspects. This effort also led to identifying > improvements in model destruction that are now under way. > > We have made considerable progress in improving actions' footprint with > work that prunes action results periodically [3]. > > As usual, with a week that follows a new release of Juju, we have > provided support to our existing users upgrading to a newer release. > > In addition, to excite and expedite developer experience, the team has > put in place an improved merge job! Now developers can with greater ease > track running tests when merging code. > > This week, the team has also worked on increasing functional coverage > for persistent storage, relations as well as model migration. > > Last but not least, in a "call for arms", we are working on enabling > users to specify primary network on VSphere overwriting the default VM > network specified in OVF files shipped with Ubuntu images [4]. The > nature of VSphere deployments, and the variety of networking > combinations that are useful in the production environments, means that > we need a hand from Juju community to verify our current approach. If > you are interested in the ability to specify network in your VSphere, > try the patch [5] linked in the bug and reach out to us with your feedback! > I've just managed to track down a vCenter suitable for testing, but it only has standard switches, and they're in use so can't be changed. I tested with a distributed vswitch/portgroup with a disabled NIC (just to see that the code would work). It would be great if someone could test with a working distributed vswitch/porgroup. I don't think we need to block releasing the fix on that, though. Cheers, Andrew Quick links: > Work pending: https://github.com/juju/juju/pulls > Recent commits: https://github.com/juju/juju/commits/develop > > Sincerely Yours, > > Anastasia > > [1] https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7653 > > [2] https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7648 and > https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7649 > > [3] https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7645 > > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1619812 > > [5] https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7660 > > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
