I'm also +1 on a timestamp. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Jason Hobbs <jason.ho...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate. > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts > <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel > > <john.mei...@canonical.com>: > >> > >> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug: > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963 > >> > >> And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have > >> some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between > each > >> "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like > something > >> that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else > would > >> always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you > could > >> correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.) > >> > >> Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it > >> does/doesn't belong? > >> > >> John > >> =:-> > >> > >> -- > >> Juju-dev mailing list > >> Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > > > > -- > > Juju-dev mailing list > > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
