> > # Questions > Should charm proof run lint check? Right now our docs say charms must > pass proof (no warning or errors) to pass review, but it does not say > the charm has to pass lint check. Thus, we should consider making lint > errors not fail charm tests or have charm proof run lint (where > appropriate, ie for py charms) and return an appropriate > error/warning/info. >
Lint is only run against charms that have voluntarily included a lint target in their Makefile. It's an opt-in extra test for charm authors. You don't have to participate, but if you include a lint target, we'll insist that it passes. This won't be officially enforced until the review queue is hooked up to the new automated charm testing stuff, at which point we'll need to update the docs, making it clear exactly which tests will be run when a review is posted. (I'll be happy to take care of that.)
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
