Attached are the meeting notes that came from the ~charmer quorem that took place today. We encourage your feedback on any meeting items discussed, and welcome proposed agenda items for the next meeting.
I'm attaching Markdown inline, and there is a PDF attachment for anyone who doesn't enjoy reading markdown. #Charmers Meeting Notes ## Minutes from 01-22-2015 Members Present: - mbruzek - jose - marcoceppi - tvansteenburgh - lazypower ## Meeting Item 1 Proposed: marcoceppi Topic: Hours for meeting. Alternate / stagger the meeting times so people outside of US timezones are accounted for and able to attend. Plan the next meeting at the end of the current meeting vs having a set schedule which yields days in which we are not able to attend due to travel and other reasons. Resolution: TODO assigned: mbruzek ## Meeting Item 2 Proposed: lazypower Topic: Charmer Meetings made more public Charmer meetings should be Ubuntu On Air / Public - to promote community involvement and take the planning process out from closed doors. The store is part of the community and it should be presented as such. Voting: - jose: +1 - mbruzek: +1 - marcoceppi: +1 - tvansteenburgh: +1 - lazypower: +1 ## Meeting Item 3 proposed: jose Topic: Review Queue Woes Review queue is a pain point from an "ingestion" standpoint, with items getting stuck in the queue and not showing up when we would expect them to. > Move the Review Queue to Canonical IS Response: Canonical IS will not run the queue in its current state due to the technology contained therein. The code is kind of hacky - and have some plans to refactor out the hacks, and time to implement said fixes is pending additional time to work. Adding admins to the system requires documentation, and adding trusted members to re-launch the jobs when the queue is in a stuck state. Resolution: pending, however issues are identified and task items assigned ## Meeting Item 4 proposed: marcoceppi Topic: Documentation Docs - sent many notices over this last month. Moving to a version locked number and the doc quality are still fairly lacking in charm authorship. As ~charmers we need to own this section and contribute to this cleanup effort. Resolution: pending, coordinate with other charmers on the mailing list. ## Meeting Item 5 proposed: marcoceppi Topic: Makefiles (subject on the list) Add makefile target to `charm proof` as a target, subject when missing is I: on charm proof. If present, lint for proper target, and set as W: when targets are not in compliance with policy for CI > Makefile templating is great, and document the proper targets for CI. However > linting the makefile doesn't necessarily make sense. Bundletester already > checks for tests in `tests/*` that are +x. There is also a limitation on > people who don't know makefiles, and aren't exciting about adding a makefile > to their charm. Ammended resolution: Remove W's and keep the template + I: message when missing. Voting: - marcoceppi: +1 - jose: +1 - mbruzek: +1 - tvansteenburgh: +1 - lazypower: +1 Resolution: TODO: Add template makefile, and update existing charm templates with template makefile. Update docs regarding makefile inclusion, and what is tested on our infrastructure. Next Meeting Date Proposed: 2PM UTC - Feb 16'th -- All the best, Charles Butler <charles.but...@canonical.com> - Juju Charmer Come see the future of datacenter orchestration: http://jujucharms.com
meeting-notes-01222015.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
