It seems rssh might be able to do this!

2016-01-20 16:25 GMT+01:00 Merlijn Sebrechts <merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com>:

> I like the idea of rsync. Is there a way to restrict access to a single
> file on the rsync server?
>
> 2016-01-20 16:16 GMT+01:00 Marco Ceppi <ma...@ondina.co>:
>
>> I don't think sending the binary via relation is a good idea. Either
>> spinning up a web service or using rsync would be a better bet
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 10:10 AM Matthew Williams <
>> matthew.willi...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Would it not be better for the charm to have a path the client can
>>> `wget` the libraries from - this path can be sent via the relation as a
>>> string
>>>
>>> Matty
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:30 PM, José Antonio Rey <j...@ubuntu.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> One of the options would be to cat the file as a string and pass that
>>>> string over the connection, finally echoing that string to foo.binary.
>>>>
>>>> What do others think?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> José Antonio Rey
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 08:25 Merlijn Sebrechts <
>>>> merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question I'd like to discuss, if you guys aren't to busy
>>>>> prepping for Ubucon.. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I've found a number of Java projects where, in order to communicate
>>>>> for example with Kafka, they require the Kafka Java libraries for that
>>>>> specific version. For the moment, I solve this by downloading the 
>>>>> libraries
>>>>> from a deployed Kafka installation and include them in the Charm. However,
>>>>> this has the disadvantage that everytime the Kafka charm version changes, 
>>>>> I
>>>>> have to update the libraries in all the charms that connect to Kafka. It
>>>>> would be better if there was a way to send these libraries over the
>>>>> connection. This way, a Charm that can connect to one version of Kafka has
>>>>> a very high chance of being able to connect to the next version.
>>>>>
>>>>> So my question is: Is there a way to send large binary files between
>>>>> Charms? Or is this problem better solved by using a subordinate
>>>>> kafka-plugin Charm like the Hadoop Charms do?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Merlijn Sebrechts
>>>>> --
>>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Juju mailing list
>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Reply via email to