I am not really super clear on how the AGPL would affect this kind of relationship. I will find someone more knowledgeable on the licensing aspect to reply.
Marco On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:18 AM Ramesh Nethi <ramesh.ne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Marco, > > > It is the former. Using Juju and charms in a commercial project/product. > > regards > Ramesh > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 at 20:11 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Could you elaborate on your usage? Are you wrapping Juju itself in a >> commercial project, using the charms in a commercial project, or producing >> a commercial charm? >> >> Either way, IANAL, so my responses would be moot, but I can try to offer >> some guidance. >> >> Marco >> >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:01 PM Ramesh Nethi <ramesh.ne...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello Jujucharmers, >>> >>> If one use Jujucharms in commercial projects where non-open source code >>> is deployed using jujucharms, is this bound by AGPL ? I understand that >>> modifying jujucharms code itself would call for open sourcing it. >>> >>> Are there any known commercial uses of jujucjarms ? >>> >>> regards >>> Ramesh >>> >> -- >>> Juju mailing list >>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>> >>
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
