Relations are best served being managed by the interface layer. Which should consume the data and raise states as appropriate.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM Nick Moffitt <nick.moff...@canonical.com> wrote: > Cory Johns: > > If a charm config option has changed, the state "config.changed" will > > be set for the duration of the hook. Additionally, specific states > > will be set for each config option that changed; that is, if option > > "foo" has changed, the state "config.changed.foo" will be set. > > Ah, this is perfectly natural syntax, and I have been wishing for > something along this line for a while! > > Could we do something similar for relation values, or is the namespace > just too complicated with all the dimensions it affords? > > -- > Nick Moffitt > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
