I used:

lxd-images import ubuntu trusty amd64 --sync --alias ubuntu-trusty

Which I stole from Jorge's blog.

bugg@tomsdevbox:~$ lxc image list
+----------------+--------------+--------+------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
|     ALIAS      | FINGERPRINT  | PUBLIC |            DESCRIPTION
  |  ARCH  |   SIZE   |         UPLOAD DATE          |
+----------------+--------------+--------+------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| ubuntu-precise | 4029ee764a39 | no     | Ubuntu 12.04 LTS server
(20160222) | x86_64 | 155.25MB | Feb 26, 2016 at 5:12pm (CET) |
| ubuntu-trusty  | 510c27eb5e30 | no     | Ubuntu 14.04 LTS server
(20160222) | x86_64 | 118.51MB | Feb 26, 2016 at 5:13pm (CET) |
| ubuntu-wily    | fb2cf6ab4af1 | no     | Ubuntu 15.10 server (20160222)
  | x86_64 | 154.27MB | Feb 26, 2016 at 5:12pm (CET) |
+----------------+--------------+--------+------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+


--------------

Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder
Tel: +44(0)5603641316

(Thanks to the Saiku community we reached our Kickstart
<http://kickstarter.com/projects/2117053714/saiku-reporting-interactive-report-designer/>
goal, but you can always help by sponsoring the project
<http://www.meteorite.bi/products/saiku/sponsorship>)

On 27 February 2016 at 12:14, John Meinel <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote:

> What image did you import into LXD? You should use something like:
>   lxd-images import ubuntu trusty --alias ubuntu-trusty
>
> (substitute xenial/wily etc as relevant.)
>
> That looks like you are using an image from linuxcontainers.org which is
> very different from the ones built by cloud-images.ubuntu.com
>
> John
> =:->
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Tom Barber <t...@analytical-labs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks John
>>
>> That was sort of my thinking too. But it's not a groups thing that I can
>> see. Same issue as root or as unprivileged users.
>>
>>
>> bugg@tomsdevbox:~$ groups
>>
>> bugg lxd
>>
>> bugg@tomsdevbox:~$ lxd --version
>> 2.0.0.beta2
>>
>>
>> bugg@tomsdevbox:~$ lxc --version
>> 2.0.0.beta2
>>
>>
>> at which point the bootstrap trust image starts fine, and i can
>>
>> lxc exec juju-...... /bin/bash
>>
>> into it. But sshd isn't running which explains why the connection refused
>> error appears.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 27 Feb 2016 11:56, "John Meinel" <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Connection refused isn't the error you would be getting if it was the
>>> current incompatibilities. What you're seeing looks more like you aren't in
>>> the "LXD" group, or you didn't refresh your groups after installing LXD.
>>> (newgrp lxd)
>>>
>>> John
>>> =:->
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Tom Barber <t...@analytical-labs.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No worries Serge I was just some Friday fun to get me out of the daily
>>>> grind. Thanks for the update.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>> On 26 Feb 2016 8:02 pm, "Serge E. Hallyn" <se...@hallyn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:42:51PM +0000, Tom Barber wrote:
>>>>> > Afternoon, got bored decided to try Jorge's blog post about Juju LXD
>>>>> and ZFS
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'd read on a few posts about the requirement for LXD beta2 because
>>>>> of API
>>>>> > incompatibilities so I found the deb's and installed them.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Its up and running and images start fine, but juju bootstrap fails
>>>>> with
>>>>> > connection refused when trying to SSH in. Something stupid i'm doing
>>>>> or
>>>>> > just broke for now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah it's just broken for now.  It will be fixed when a new feature
>>>>> branch
>>>>> is merged, which I think is supposed to happen on or before Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> -serge
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Reply via email to