Hey Juju,

Andrew, Kostas, Cory, and I made our way through a slew of reviews.  It
went something like this:


   -

   minecraft
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1523896
      -

      This is a rewrite of the precise minecraft charm, now using layers
      and targeting trusty.
      -

      We found a problem with the author’s ./trunk branch (possibly due to
      bzr artifacts between ‘charm build’ attempts), and suggested some test
      changes via a PR.  The author addressed both of these issues and
all looks
      good.
      -

      +1, promulgated, https://jujucharms.com/minecraft/trusty is live!
      -

   rsyslog-forwarder-ha
   -


      
https://code.launchpad.net/~johnsca/charms/trusty/rsyslog-forwarder-ha/lint/+merge/288469
      -

      Fixes lint issues
      -

      Previously, ‘make test’ would pollute the system with a version of
      PyYAML that was incompatible with ‘charm proof’. The author has
fixed this
      with tox.
      -

      +1, merged
      -

   zulu8
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1519858
      -

      This is a layered bash charm that implements the java interface to
      provide a Zulu java environment.
      -

      Testing was successful, and while we created an MP for minor tweaks
      (e.g. decreasing log noise), this didn’t warrant holding it up
for further
      review.
      -

      +1, this is the first promulgated charm leveraging the java interface
      layer!
      -

   rlec (new redis charm)
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1551133
      -

      Missing crypto hash verification of the download
      -

      Issues with handling of leadership and node registration
      -

      Some erroneous boilerplate from `charm create` template
      -

      We also offered relation suggestions
      -

      -1 for now while the author considers these points
      -

   haproxy (new statistics interface)
   -


      
https://code.launchpad.net/~verterok/charms/trusty/haproxy/statistics-interface/+merge/288005
      -

      Bundletester (still) works fine, make build with new test works too.
      However, I manually deployed and related to telegraf and couldn’t see any
      hooks fired related to statistics so have asked the author for
instructions
      to test further…
      -

      Author replied almost immediately and suggested I test against a
      different telegraf MR - it did and it worked, so +1 for merging.
      -

   Apache2 (timeouts fix)
   -


      
https://code.launchpad.net/~kwmonroe/charms/trusty/apache2/timeouts/+merge/287222
      -

      Adding some slack in the unit deployment timeout.
      -

      Tests pass.
      -

      +1 for merging
      -

   Apache2 (ensure_package_status fix)
   -


      
https://code.launchpad.net/~lutostag/charms/trusty/apache2/fix-extra-package-hold/+merge/287224
      -

      This fix is for a check on extra package installations that was
      producing a warning.
      -

      We reviewed the code and run a couple of tests.
      -

      +1, merged


   -

   fiche (new charm)
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1530976
      -

      The author addressed our comments. However we asked for the layer
      that is used to build the charm.
      -

      Adam Israel jumped in to finish the review and promulgate (thanks
      Adam!)
      -

   midonet-gateway (new charm)
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1541735
      -

      Review items addressed
      -

      Unable to run tests, but James offered to do so and give final sign
      off.
      -

      Otherwise, looks good from review.  +1
      -

   collectd (new charm)
   -

      https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 and layer at
      https://code.launchpad.net/~jacekn/canonical-is-charms/collectd-composer
      -

      This is the third iteration over the collectd charm, and we
      appreciate the author’s dedication to addressing our comments!
      -

      Unfortunately, we spotted a small typo in the templating section that
      needs to be fixed. We also had some suggestions to improve the
README.  We
      submitted an MP to address both of these issues.
      - We’ll wait for the author’s input on our MP, but feel this is very
      close to promulgation.


Thanks for all the submissions - we found lots of great new additions
during this review.  Questions or comments?  Let us know in #juju on
freenode.  If we're not playing minecraft, we'll be right with you :)

Thanks,
-Kevin Monroe
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Reply via email to