Hi Kevin,
As you suggested we have made all the changes to IBM Installation Manger
layer (https://github.com/kwmonroe/layer-ibm-installation-manager) locally
( in ./reactive/ibm-installation-manager.sh) to make it is a functional
layer and we are able to deploy IBM-IM successfully.
But when we are trying to install IBM-WAS on top of IBM-IM layer, IM
layer states like 'im.installed' is not recognized in IBM-WAS layer.
Although we have set LAYER_PATH and included IBM-IM Layer in layer.yaml:
includes: ['layer:ibm-installation-manager']
Could you please suggest us is there anything to be added to use IBM-IM
layer in other products eg:WAS...!!
Regards,
Shruthima Almavar.
From: Shruthima Almavar/India/IBM
To: Kevin Monroe <kevin.mon...@canonical.com>
Cc: juju <juju@lists.ubuntu.com>, Matt Bruzek
<matthew.bru...@canonical.com>
Date: 03/22/2016 03:51 PM
Subject: Re: Query on IBM-Installtion Manger Charm Layer
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for providing your thoughts on IBM Installation Manager layer ...!!
Will work on this and if any doubts will check with you.
Regards,
Shruthima.
From: Kevin Monroe <kevin.mon...@canonical.com>
To: Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com>
Cc: Shruthima Almavar/India/IBM@IBMIN, juju <juju@lists.ubuntu.com>
Date: 02/11/2016 05:23 AM
Subject: Re: Query on IBM-Installtion Manger Charm Layer
Hi Shruthima,
We came up with what we think an IBM Installation Manager base layer might
look like:
https://github.com/kwmonroe/layer-ibm-installation-manager
This is not a functional layer yet (ie, it needs to do the actual IBM IM
installation in ./reactive/ibm-installation-manager.sh), but we think this
is a good starting point for a layer that can be extended by other IBM
software (eg: WebSphere) that utilizes IBM IM for their install. Check
out the README at the above repo to see how we envision other charm layers
using this IBM IM base layer.
Take a look and let us know if you have any questions or concerns with
this approach to providing a common IBM IM layer for others to extend.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com>
wrote:
Hello Shurthima,
Thanks for reaching out to the Juju list. The layered approach is the way
to write all new charms. We do recommend that you use the basic layer when
creating a new base level feature such as IBM Installation Manager. To do
that the layer.yaml should look like this:
includes: ['layer:basic']
As far as interface, I would have to know more about what services IBM IM
can use or interact with. If IBM IM can talk to a database it should have
a database relation. If the product has an web interface it should
implement the http interface. You as the author knows the product better
than I would. Interface layers make it very easy to use juju interfaces.
We have some documentation about how to write layered charms, for more
information please read:
https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/developer-getting-started
Please email the list if you have any more specific questions. Thanks!
- Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Shruthima Almavar <salma...@in.ibm.com>
wrote:
Hello Team,
I am working on IBM-Installation Manager charm and I will be developing
this charm from layers .
i have explored on layers and thought to use basic layer which is present
in "http://interface.juju.com"; but not sure about it ??
Could you please suggest me which layer and interface i can use for
charming IBM-IM product. Thanks.
Regards,
Shruthima
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
