I believe that reserving the juju- prefix would be good. I, personally, haven't seen any charms using them.
-- José Antonio Rey On Mon, Mar 28, 2016, 21:04 Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:49 PM Andrew Wilkins < > andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There's a code review in progress (http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/4286/) >> that will introduce a predefined action, "juju-run", which is part of the >> replacement for the current SSH-based juju-run. >> > > This is interesting. What's the semantics for this? How does juju-run > action work for machine level items? > > This means that "juju-run" will no longer be a valid action name for use >> in a charm. This may come up again in the future, so we think it would be >> prudent to reserve a namespace for additional predefined actions. The most >> straightforward thing to do would be to reserve the "juju-" prefix, like we >> do for relations. >> > > This seems fine, we'll add "juju-run" as a blacklist in charm proof. > > Any objections? Does anyone have any actions using the "juju-" prefix >> already? >> > > I don't believe so, I'l do a quick search in the charm store though to > verify > > >> Cheers, >> Andrew >> > -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> juju-...@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >> > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
