Kevin Monroe and I reviewed several charm designs, and one bundle design from our parters at IBM.
All these designs use the reactive framework and are well thought out. Most got our +1 but we had a few questions about ibm-pac that was unclear. Here is the summary: was-nd - approved last week, but thanks for the new diagram - https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Uh_EghiBKZiDf8ZiM6T-VQzVfoTj4gOlwTl9oieBwc/comment xcat - replies to previous comments seem sound - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DgK79jsP2mnxfu_5uHWDSgMriy1VN3kYUK2On2OCSU8/comment was-wxs - a few comments, but nothing blocking. please let us know if you have questions about our comments - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zc396dKOHQU-PI1MvVT02q966FAs_H5f2X2L1ERcXBI/comment web infrastructure bundle - minor comments to keep in mind when implementing this bundle, but this looks *really* interesting and is well thought-out. nice job! - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WWo8PSAjRrb0D4swdX2mghPgEbgT5LA2vD9wHsv8Qlc/comment ibm-dsm: - minor comments, overall +1 - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQY5gJNDVTDPECWDmLzkNWWwGHukWHHucRQIosuL1RU/comment ibm-pac: - We had a few questions about co-location of charms on this design. While you can use --to we generally use a subordinate for proper co-location. We will wait to hear back from the partners if the can use a subordinate charm. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E46oFIUr0h_MpCLiGTnp2vD-UrKdLCuNP3T3hD4etqo/comment Thanks, - Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com>
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
