I've "conjured-up" what I think would be a great enhancement to the current user mgmt capability in 2.0.
As things stand, one can add a user to a model, and set a permission category of either read (read), or write (read/write). This functionality is awesome, and a huge step for juju (applause)!!!!! Admins of juju can now create, manage, and maintain the users and users access policy associated with a model (applause, again, seriously). As a logical next step, why don't we take the user all the way to the instance? What I'm thinking of is an '--os' flag that could be specified on user creation! This flag would signify that the user need be created on the instances in the current model. Ssh keys key(s) for a user could be added, and *associated*, and provisioned alongside the respective user, and user account on the machine. This functionality would give juju deployed infrastructure a huge edge in the ease of user management/maintainability for any organization, and massive bragging rights in enterprise land due to the increased PCI compliance revolving around finer granularity in user access accounts. I feel like the majority of the big pieces are already In place, the primary road blocks I foresee (probably a lot more): 1. User sensitive ssh-keys 2. Machine-level user provisioning template /UserManagerModel 3. Os-level user access/permission policy (what is generic/default yet tuned and hardened?) That about wraps it up, hopefully I got my point across to some degree. Thoughts? -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
