Typically you'd be able to tell the source for charms set via charm show ubuntu homepage charm show ubuntu bugs-url
In this case they're both set to https://ubuntu.com so not helpful in getting to the source. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:37 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: > Was there a merge proposal or pull request for these changes in the > charm's upstream repo? If not, is there a branch that can be proposed > against the charm repo? Or, is there a new upstream repo for the charm? > > The candidate charm in the store is helpful to validate functionality, but > as a contributor to the existing charm, I simply cannot determine where I > might base future changes, or rebase existing works in progress. > > -1 to this moving forward, from an upstream charm code contributor > perspective, pending clarification/completion of the upstream repo and > review. > > Setting aside those issues of principle, I've confirmed that it does work > with 1.25.6: Precise, Trusty, Xenial units. Having this in place will be a > nice touch. > > Cheers, > > Ryan > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.pen...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Marco, >> >> This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and >> seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool. >> >> I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle pressure >> to get people to set a workload status. >> >> Winning!!! >> >> Tim >> >> On 15/09/16 08:39, Marco Ceppi wrote: >> >>> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try >>> again? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marco Ceppi >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beis...@canonical.com >>> <mailto:ryan.beis...@canonical.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes? I'd like >>> to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but --channel >>> isn't a thing there. >>> >>> I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received: >>> ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ryan >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Marco Ceppi >>> <marco.ce...@canonical.com <mailto:marco.ce...@canonical.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's >>> slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the >>> Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the charm. >>> However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to >>> look incomplete. I know a few people depend on the Ubuntu charm >>> for setup purposes and testing. I'd hate to be the source of >>> breakage for that charm so I'm announcing an update here. >>> >>> Screenshot from 2016-09-14 09-48-31.png >>> >>> Other than the obvious changes to status, this also implements >>> workload version. >>> >>> If you depend on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to >>> test the latest version with >>> >>> `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate` >>> >>> If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week >>> I'll move what's in candidate to stable. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marco Ceppi >>> >>> -- >>> Juju mailing list >>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju@lists.ubuntu.com> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
