On 20 October 2016 at 16:09, Rye Terrell <rye.terr...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > Subordinate charms only make sense when collocated. And I would argue that > subordinates are extremely common, at least in production environments. > > > In this context clean up is very important because it's not unusual for > > operators > to switch technologies. For example replace telegraf with node-exporter > or collectd. > > With that in mind, I'd like to reiterate one of my original questions: how > do we handle cleanup in the case where two or more colocated charms have > the same dependencies? In the case of background services, do we not stop & > disable them? Do we stop & disable them and expect the remaining charms to > repair the situation? > Do you have a real world example at hand?
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
