Circling back around to this. Do we have an ETA or any updates on the
progress of interfaces.juju.solutions being folded into jujucharms.com?

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, 11:20 AM Marco Ceppi <marco.ce...@canonical.com>
wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online.
> This is unfortunate, but we're in the process of getting the
> interfaces.juju.solutions site, folded into the charm store properly. This
> service has done it's job in providing the initial indexing but as we see
> today it's become integral to the operation of charm authorship and should
> be as robust as the charm store itself.
>
> To address concerns about "what if". Juju, the interfaces site, the charm
> layers, are all open source projects. While some items aren't directly
> configurable if we ever did enter a period where Canonical wasn't directly
> maintaining infrastructure for Juju and Charms the community could uphold
> these projects and elect to run them directly. Juju is a key platform to
> Canonical just as it is to you all. While outages like this may occur, we
> are iterating quickly to make sure projects like the interfaces site are
> folded into jujucharms.com and served with the same level SLA and HA as
> you've come to expect.
>
> Marco
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:44 AM Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I don't really think Mark is going to do one, my point is that for
> platforms like this to survive if they depend on central services for
> build/running etc, the services shouldn't just be maintained by a single
> entity.
>
> HA sure will solve some issues but I also think that distributing
> ownership also mitigates risk.
>
> On 12 Nov 2016 16:39, "James Beedy" <jamesbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here's something thats been troubling me for a while, Canonical are the
> single point of failure with juju. For example, this morning
> interfaces.juju.solutions appears to be offline, thats not the end of the
> world but of course I can't download layers from it.
>
> I entirely second this. Interfaces.juju.solutions needs to have some kind
> of uptime guarantee, and probably need each component deployed in
> HA/federated to ensure the uptime.
>
> Companies/people are building infrastructure around the charm store,
> interfaces.juju.solutions, and juju itself, what happens when 100 entities
> realize that their CI (or any critical infrastructure) has been down for an
> amount of time? For many, this could stunt development and increase budget
> expenditures.
>
>
> Similarly, if Mark for whatever reason decided he couldn't be bothered with
> Juju any more and went and did something else, the users would be without
> resource that is vital to people building stuff.
>
>
> I have to disagree with you here. Mark is an amazing driver for these
> technologies and technology communities, but they exist outside of, and
> disparate of Mark and Canonical. While the world (as well as these
> technologies) would undoubtedly not be same if not for Mark's
> contribution(s), I think the idea here is that the majority of the software
> in Canonical stack has enough wind under it to survive in the wild.
>
> Does mirroring capabilities exist for other people to mirror
> interfaces.juju.solutions and can you tell juju to use another portal? That
> way, much like maven central, those of us with bandwidth could mirror
> resources that are vital for smooth running of Juju operations.
>
> True, mirroring would be huge, but shouldn't be a solution ..... We should
> deploy the site across multiple az/regions if you ask me :-)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-- 
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Reply via email to