I prepared two min charms which I needed for a customer. cs:~tilmanbaumann/logstash-conf-d-1 https://github.com/tbaumann/charm-logstash-conf-d cs:~tilmanbaumann/logstash-input-elasticsearch-1 https://github.com/tbaumann/charm-logstash-input-elasticsearch
Those are subordninate charms that can be used like plugins to load custom configurations in logstash (/etc/logstash/conf.d/) Or to connect logstash to elasticsearch via relations. During this development I found a number of bugs that made it quite hard to be productive. Charm tools is broken. Thank god there is a custom ppa for it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/charm-tools/+bug/1660004 And juju test doesn't work. That is why my charms don't have tests yet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1608723 I felt quite confident about my manual tests and I see no reason to believe #1608723 will be gone soon, so I decided to submit my charms for review anyway. Probably wasting your time. But I was eager to see some feedback. But, I couldn't. The review form at https://review.jujucharms.com/ will respond with a empty response (Firefox says https protocol error. Chrome says empty response.) Where would I report that as a bug? So you see, right now quite a lot is broken for charm developers. At least those running Zesty. Please excuse my mini rant about infrastructure. I suppose this will get better again. But perhaps someone can offer some opinions about my charms? :D Cheers Tilman Baumann PS: https://github.com/tbaumann/charm-logstash-conf-d has a tests branch with a initial testing idea. But I could never test it... The layer code is slightly more current than the published charms. I found a few typos I think. -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
