Kevin,
"Or is that source waiting on this PR to bring it in line with your es-7
charm"
- This is the case
If we merge the xenial support PR, it will be even with the
cs:~jamesbeedy/elasticsearch-7.
~James
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Kevin Monroe <kevin.mon...@canonical.com>
wrote:
> Hey James!
>
> First up, thanks so much for bringing the ES charm up to v5.x! Can you
> tell me if the source for cs:~jamesbeedy/elasticsearch-7 is the same as
> what we've got here:
>
> https://github.com/charms/charm-elasticsearch
>
> Or is that source waiting on this PR to bring it in line with your es-7
> charm:
>
> https://github.com/charms/charm-elasticsearch/pull/2
>
> The PR LGTM, so I'll merge it on your ack. Let me know if there are other
> outstanding bits that need to go into this repo. Once that's done, I
> propose we push this to the ~elastic-ops namespace of which you're a member:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~elastic-ops
>
> And then promulgate the ~elastic-ops charm rev. As Rick and others have
> mentioned, teams help distribute ongoing maintenance to people that have a
> vested interest in certain charms.
>
> @Simon / Bret: you are on the ~onlineservices-charmers team that owns the
> current promulgated ES charm. Would you be willing to relinquish
> maintainership to ~elastic-ops (and would you like to be members of that
> team)?
>
> Thanks!
> -Kevin Monroe
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Rick Harding <rick.hard...@canonical.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'd also encourage you to test an upgrade path from the current charm to
>> yours to help comfort any current users of the charm that if there's a
>> change it'll go smoothly for users.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:00 PM Tim Van Steenburgh <
>> tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey James, my point was that if you want to replace the existing
>>> top-level ES charm with your own, we would need agreement from the
>>> maintainers of the existing charm.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:45 PM, James Beedy <jamesbe...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @tim yeah ... possibly I'm not looking for promulgation then, and just
>>>> need to push it and grant everyone because its already promulgated?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Tim Van Steenburgh <
>>>> tim.van.steenbu...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There's already a top-level elasticsearch charm.
>>>>> https://jujucharms.com/elasticsearch/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:13 PM, James Beedy <jamesbe...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Request for promulgation of Elasticsearch. The Elasticsearch charm
>>>>>> can be found at cs:~jamesbeedy/elasticsearch-7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
>>>>>> an/listinfo/juju
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Juju mailing list
>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
>>> an/listinfo/juju
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
>> an/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
